BackLanguage: hungarian
Abstract: The paper investigates the factors shaping the number and content of interpellations, a form of parliamentary questions by MPs in post-regime change Hungary. A number of hypotheses are drawn from four theoretical propositions: political control; policy-orinted information seeking; parliamentary group leadership and constituency service. A new database consisted of 4096 observations for the period 1990-2014 of the Comparative Agendas Project is compiled in order to analyze these hypotheses and to better understand the legislative activity of MPs. Count data regressions are utilized in order to gauge the impact of government and opposition position; the source of the mandate in a mixed electoral system; and the position in the parliamentary on the number of interpellations presented. We find that opposition MPs interpellate more, whereas representatives of single-member districts and regional lists interpellate less than their peers. Computer-assisted content analysis techniques and regressions are used to describe the text of interpellations in terms of their geographical and policy content. Our results show that representatives from single member districts and regional lists make more reference to local issues, although these references are not necessarily aimed at their own district or county. Furthermore, policy specialization (as measured by committee membership) increases the likelihood of submitting pertinent parliamentary questions.
Sources:
Database, Codebook and Texts of Interpellations
Database and Codebook of Party Hierarchy
Database of Single-Member Districts
The database composing the basis of the paper's calculations